5 Myths About Legally Binding Separation Agreements in Ontario (And Why Some Professionals Don’t Want You to Know the Truth)
- Michelle Rakowski

- 6 days ago
- 4 min read

Every so often, a client tells me something that makes my eyebrows go up, not because it’s rare, but because it still irritates me. Recently, someone shared that his lawyer confidently told him the separation agreement he and his ex created in mediation wasn’t legally binding.
This is precisely the kind of misinformation that causes families unnecessary stress. So let me say this clearly, right within the first breath of this conversation: legally binding separation agreements in Ontario absolutely do not require a lawyer to write them.
Yet myths like this spread constantly. Some come from confusion. Some come from professionals who should know better. And some… well, some come from places I won’t speculate about, but integrity isn’t always part of the motivation.
So today, we’re breaking down the biggest misconceptions about legally binding separation agreements in Ontario, and replacing fear with facts.
Myth #1: Only Lawyers Can Create Legally Binding Separation Agreements in Ontario
This myth is everywhere, and it’s flat-out wrong.
A separation agreement is, legally speaking, a domestic contract. Ontario contract law doesn’t require a specific profession to draft a contract. There is nothing in the Family Law Act that says, “Only a lawyer may type these words.”
In reality, mediators regularly create separation agreements that are clear, detailed, and fully enforceable. I could show you a mediator-drafted agreement and a lawyer-drafted agreement side by side, and you would never know which was which. The content matters, not the job title of the person formatting it.
And here’s something most people never hear: Lawyers in Ontario refer clients to me when they know the situation doesn’t justify thousands of dollars in legal drafting fees. Some lawyers do have integrity. They recognize when mediation is the more appropriate, and more affordable, option.
I’ve even had real estate lawyers ask me to write agreements for their clients because they trust the quality and clarity of mediation work.
So no: a lawyer is not required to create legally binding separation agreements in Ontario.
Myth #2: A Separation Agreement Only Becomes Legal When a Lawyer Signs It
Let’s clear this up once and for all.
A lawyer’s signature is not the only way to make a Separation Agreement legally binding in Canada.
If you can sign a car lease, mortgage documents, business contracts, or service agreements without a lawyer’s signature, you can absolutely sign a separation contract the same way.
What makes legally binding separation agreements in Ontario valid is simple:
Both parties sign the agreement
Each signature is witnessed
The terms are voluntary, informed, and clear
Independent legal advice is helpful and often wise, but it’s not a requirement to make something “legal.”
Myth #3: Separation Agreements Must Be Notarized to Be Enforceable
This one makes me laugh, mostly so I don’t groan.
I once confronted a notary I know about why they notarize Separation Agreements, rather than informing the client that they don't need it. He shrugged and said, “We just do it anyway”. Yes, and make some bank doing it. This is why legal professions have a bad rep.
Notarization does not make a domestic contract legally binding.
Witnessing does.
The confusion persists because the word “notarized” sounds official. But the Family Law Act doesn’t require it, and notarizing adds nothing to the enforceability of legally binding separation agreements in Ontario.
Myth #4: The Court Won’t Accept Mediator-Written Agreements
If this were true, my entire practice would collapse overnight.
My clients have successfully filed mediator-written agreements for:
Their legal divorce decree
Court-ordered parenting terms
Court-ordered support terms
Motions to enforce specific clauses
Every one of these went through without any issue.
Why? Because courts look for:
Clarity
Voluntary participation
Compliance with the Family Law Act
Precedent-backed clauses
Proper signatures and witnessing
They do not prioritize who typed the document.
If mediator-created agreements were not considered legally binding separation agreements in Ontario, none of these filings would succeed. But they do, consistently.
Myth #5: Mediated Agreements Aren’t as Strong or Enforceable as Lawyer-Drafted Ones
Let’s talk about enforceability.
A contract is enforceable when it’s:
Clear
Understood by both parties
Voluntary (no pressure or coercion)
Comprehensive enough to outline all major terms
Signed and witnessed properly
Transactional - each party is agreeing to specific obligations or exchanges
That’s it.
Mediation often produces agreements that are more thoughtful, more customized, and more transparent than those created through adversarial processes. Both people understand the terms because they shaped them, not because a stranger handed them a document to sign at the eleventh hour.
If anything, that clarity strengthens enforcement.
Enforceability comes from the content, not the profession of the drafter. And this is exactly why mediator-written agreements function fully as legally binding separation agreements in Ontario.
A Real-Life Example (Details Anonymized)
A few years back, a lawyer actually said to a couple, “You don’t need me for this. You need mediation.” He told them I would likely produce a clearer, more tailored agreement for their situation.
We met, worked through every detail together, and drafted an agreement that reflected their intentions respectfully and accurately. They signed, had the signatures witnessed, and then filed it in court.
Everything went through smoothly; no delays, no challenges, no questions about “who wrote it.”
That’s how it works when people tell the truth.
Next Steps (CTA)
If you’re separating and want clarity, without fear, pressure, or unnecessary legal costs, you’re welcome to book a consultation with me at Alliston Resolutions. We’ll walk through your options and make sure you feel grounded, informed, and supported.




Comments